| Home - Latest News | Introduction | Bayside Messages | Directives from Heaven | Testimonies | Veronica Lueken | Miraculous Photos | Videos |
Have you been brainwashed on evolution?
"Man cannot rationalize sin; man cannot rationalize his being which eliminates the Creator and His creation from history. My children, it is a delusion set upon the world by satan." - Our Lady of the Roses, July 25, 1977
Duane T. Gish, Ph.D. (Biochemistry,
University of California, Berkeley) was Associate Director of the Institute of
Creation Research and Professor of Natural Science and Apologetics at Christian
Heritage College, San Diego, California.
He spent 18 years in biochemical and biomedical research with the Upjohn
Company and at
The following
lecture was given at the
As a scientist,
I believe we must examine all the evidence and facts before we can come to any
conclusion on any given subject. I'm asking only one thing of this audience...
that you examine the facts thoroughly and without prejudice.
The refusal by
science teachers to consider creation as a possible explanation for the origin
of all things, is unwarranted and undesirable. The student is being
indoctrinated without being given a complete presentation of the evidence.
This situation
could be remedied by taking a closer look at both creation and evolution.
First, let's
examine the claims of each. The
EVOLUTIONIST states that all life gradually evolved from a single cell, which
had evolved from dead matter.
CREATIONISTS
believe that life and our existence came by the acts of a Creator.
The evidence
that the EVOLUTIONIST needs to establish his claims, is fossils showing a
gradual step-by-step development of lower animal life into more and more complex
forms.
And this should
be evident by the presence in the fossil record of many transitional forms.
The evidence
needed to support CREATION, is fossils showing complex life appearing
suddenly... with no fossil evidence of lower animals developing into new and
complex forms of life.
Now, lets look
at the actual fossil evidence. The earliest fossils to be found are in the
Cambrian rock strata. And the billions of fossils found there are all of highly
complex forms of life with no evidence of these complex forms gradually
developing from a simple form of life.
According to
evolutionists it would have required 1.5 billion years for these animals to have
evolved. Not a single, indisputable
multicellular fossil has been found anywhere in the world in a rock supposedly
older that Cambrian rocks. Billions
of highly complex animals... trilobites, brachiopods, corals, worms, jellyfish,
etc... just suddenly appear, with no signs of gradual development from lower
forms.
Also, throughout
the remainder of the fossil record there is a remarkable absence of the many
transitional forms demanded by the theory of evolution.
There are
hundreds of thousands of missing links between invertebrates and vertebrates.
The sea squirt is presumed to be the ancestry of the vertebrate.
According to
evolutionists it would have taken 100 million years for fish to have evolved
from an invertebrate. But there is absolutely no fossil evidence showing that
this took place.
Again, the
evolutionists claims that it took perhaps 50 million years for a fish to evolve
into an amphibian. But again, there
are no transitional forms. For example... not a single fossil with part
fins... part feet has ever been found.
And this is true
between every major plant and animal kind.
All higher categories of living things, such as complex invertebrates,
fishes, amphibians, reptiles, flying reptiles, birds, bats, primates and man,
appear abruptly.
Let me quote
some comments by LEADING EVOLUTIONISTS.
Charles Darwin
admitted that "As by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have
existed, who do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of
the earth? The number of intermediate kinds, between all living and extinct
species, must have been inconceivably great."
Prof. George
Gaylord Simpson of
Prof. E.J.H.
Corner of
There is no
evidence of even one species changing into another. As the late Prof. R.
Goldschmidt of the
If evolution is
true, why don't we see living stages of evolution today? Shouldn't new organs
and new structure still be appearing today? Surely if evolutionary processes had
truly existed in the past they would still be operating today.
The fossil of
the bird (Archaeopteryx) is claimed by some to be a link between birds and
reptiles. But there was a world of difference between reptiles and
Archaeopteryx. It had wings, feathers...and it flew! The fact that it had claws
on its wings does not prove that it had a reptilian ancestry. There are two
birds living today that possess claws!
All
paleontologists (those who study fossils) now acknowledge that
Archaeopteryx
was a true bird.
The alleged
horse series was created more out of imagination than from fossil evidence. The
fossils for this series are not found in the proper time sequence as indicated
by the evolutionists, and the major types appear abruptly, without transitions.
And there is an
interesting discrepancy in the skeletal development of this series.
Eohippus had 18
pairs of Ribs.
Orohippus had
only 15 pairs.
Then Pliohippus
jumped to 19
Equus Scotti is
back to 18.
However, there
is no evidence whatever in the fossil record or elsewhere that giraffes with
short necks have ever existed. And what would have happened to young giraffes
with relatively short necks?
The cover of the
journal, Science, December 9, 1966, shows a photograph of a bat fossil that is
alleged to be over 50 million years old. This is said to be the oldest fossil
bat, but it is the same as a modern bat! Why isn't there any evidence of change
after 50 million years?
It might be will
now to look at the "evidence" which anthropologists have assembled, in an
attempt to reconstruct the evolution of man.
Some consider
Ramapithecus to have been hominid (a man-like ape), and this judgment has been
made solely on the basis of a few fragments of the jaw. That's all the fossil
fragments they have.
Dr. Jolley has
recently reported that a species of baboon in
The first find
of Australopithecines was by Dart in 1924. He pointed out many ape-like features
of the skull, but he believed the teeth to be manlike. Its brain was only about
1/3 as large as that of modern man. It was only about 4 feet tall.
Recently,
Richard Leakey, the son of Dr. Leakey. published evidence that indicated that
the Australopithecines were long-armed, short-legged knucklewalkers, similar to
living African apes. These creatures were nothing but apes!
In
All of these
creatures had been killed and eaten, and the skulls preserved as trophies. Some
prominent anthropologists believe that hunter was true Man. Peking "man" must
then have been simply a giant ape.
Java Man is put
together on the evidence of a femur (large leg bone), a skull cap, and three
molar teeth. These parts were found
within a 50 foot range, in a space of one year. Dr. Dubois, its discoverer,
concealed for 30 years the fact that he found human skulls near his Java Man,
and at the same level. So man was already there when this creature was alive.
The femur was probably from a human, and the skull cap was probably that of a
giant ape. Before his death, and after he had convinced most of the early
skeptics, Dubois changed his mind and decided that Java Man was probably a giant
gibbon and not man-like at all.
Neanderthal Man
has a skeletal structure of modern man. His cranial capacity exceeded that of
modern man. It was claimed that he lived as long as about 100,000 years ago, but
all anthropologists now believe that he was just as human as you and I.
Complete
skeletons of the Cro-Magnons have been found. Their cranial capacity was greater
that modern man's. If he were alive today, and if he were to walk down the
street in a business suit, he would go completely unnoticed.
Two of the most
embarrassing so-called missing links for evolutionists, are the NEBRASKA MAN and
the PILTDOWN MAN.
At the famous
Scopes evolution trail in
The evidence was
that of a tooth that was supposed to have come from a prehistoric man who
supposedly lived one million years ago. However, years later, when more fossils
were unearthed, it was discovered that Nebraska Man was only a pig. I think this
is a case where a pig made a monkey out of an evolutionist!
In 1912 Charles
Dawson brought forth the PILTDOWN MAN. A piece of skull was the evidence
acclaimed by experts as that of an ape-man who was about a half million years
old.
But in 1953 the
hoax was exposed. The jawbone turned out to be that of a modern ape. The teeth
had been filed down, and the bones were artificially colored to deceive the
public. The ease with which this fraud fooled the world's greatest authorities
illustrated the powerful influence of preconceived ideas among evolutionists.
But in the
August 1973 issues of Reader's Digest there was a report about two phenomenal
discoveries which were recently made in
The second was
the finding of skeletons of sophisticated humans who are reputed to have lived
100,00 years ago. They had developed the art of mining, were able to keep
records, count, and had also developed sophisticated tools. But according to the
evolutionists this type of sophisticated humans was not supposed to have
appeared on the scene until 65,000 years later.
I personally
heard Richard Leakey, the discoverer of the 2.8 million year old man, speak in
Let us now
consider the beginnings of life itself.
By chance,
nothingness developed into substance. That evolved into a very highly complex
organization... without a designer.
Darwinists assume that life, or the primitive cell, arose by pure chance. For
example, by chance some amino acids were formed. Then from these the necessary
protein was formed.
The first
problem is that the rate of destruction of even relatively simple chemical
compounds, such as amino acids, by ultraviolet light or electrical discharges
far exceeds their rate of formation. No significant quantity would thus ever be
produced.
Another
insuperable barrier is that these amino acids would have to be arranged in an
exact sequence to form a protein...just like the letters in a sentence. Mere
laws of chemistry and physics cannot do that.
The probability
of a protein of only 50 amino acids forming by chance would be 1/10 to the 65th
power, or in layman language -
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 to ONE!
Even the very
simplest cell contains several thousand different kinds of proteins, and many
billions of each kind, plus all kinds of DNA, RNA, and other highly complex
molecules, along with many complex structures, arranged in an incredibly complex
system.
DNA and RNA are
required to produce protein enzymes, but protein enzymes are required to produce
DNA and RNA. Which, then, came first?
Dr. N.W. Pirie
of the Rothamstead Experimental Station at
Dr. John Moore
spoke during the annual session of the American Association for the Advancement
of Science. He described the theory that man evolved from "amoeba and
sea-slimes" as an "incredible religion," but not "science."
Dr. John Moore
stated:
"Chromosome
variation in animals does not correspond to predictions based on evolution
theory. There is absolutely no pattern of increase of chromosome number from
less complex to more complex, but this should take place if evolution were true.
Furthermore, hereditary material in the genes of chromosomes shows great
variation, frogs having more genetic material that do humans, which contradicts
the theory of evolution. Darwinism is more illogical than biological."
Professor Henry
M. Morris has shown that the theory of evolution contradicts the universally
accepted laws of thermodynamics.
The Second Law
of Thermodynamics states that all things left to themselves always tend to go
from the complex to the simple, form the organized to the disorganized.
Evolution would require just the opposite... the continually building up from
the simplest to the more complex forms.
I would now like
for us to consider the complexity of the order and design of our planet and
universe. In researching the size of the earth we discover that the mass and
size of the earth are just right. If the earth's diameter were 7,200 miles instead of 8,000, almost the whole earth, due to a
lessening of its atmospheric mantle, would be reduced to a snow and ice waste.
If there were a
variation of only 10 percent, either in the increase or decrease of the size of
our world, no life as we know it on earth would be possible!
If the average
temperature of the earth were raised but two or three degrees you could bid
goodbye to many of the big cities of the earth, for the glaciers would melt, and
that in turn would flood many of the big cities. This would also inundate
hundreds of thousands of square miles of our most fertile lands.
The earth's
axis, which now points toward the North Star, is tilted just right - at the
strange angle of 23 degrees from the perpendicular, that is, in relation to the
plane of its orbit. Because of this tilt the sun appears to go north in the
summer and south in the winter, giving us four seasons in the temperate zone.
For the same
reason, there is twice as much of the land area of the earth that can be
cultivated and inhabited as there would be if the sun were always over the
equator, with no change of seasons. Think what would happen if the earth were
tilted any other way than it is.
We live
miraculously on this planet, protected from eight killer rays from the sun, by a
thin layer of ozone high up in our atmosphere. If that little belt of ozone, approximately forty miles up and only
one eighth of an inch thick (if compressed), should suddenly drift into space,
all life on earth would perish.
The first
miracle, in the light of what the rest of the universe is like, is that there IS
an ocean here! In the universe as a whole, liquid water of any kind - sweet or
salt - is an exotic rarity.
Contrary to
common belief, the liquid state is exceptional in nature; most matter in the
universe seems to consist either of flaming gases, as in the stars, or frozen
solids drifting in the abyss of space.
The amazing
accuracy and smoothness with which the universe revolves - as a flawless,
perfect machine - can be seen in the perfection that characterizes the journey
of our earth around the sun. It
takes the earth 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes an 48 seconds to make its journey
around the sun. And in this circuit
the earth has varied in only the
slightest degree. None but an
infinite GOD could achieve such flawless, continuous PERFECTION.
I believe as GOD
states in the Bible (Romans 1:20) that nature and creation itself reveals that
there is a Creator. We know that
for every design there is a designer, and for every law there is a lawgiver.
"In the beginning God created" is still the most up-to-date statement on
the origin of the universe and all that it contains.
And now I would
like to speak personally to you ... the reader of this little book.
God is revealed through His creation... but the greatest revelation God
has given to man, He gave through His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ.
The Old Testament part of the Bible informs us that God made man in His
own image and likeness, to be His sons.
Man, however rebelled against God.
We have all determined to go our own way and disregard our real Father.
Jesus Christ revealed that God dearly loves us, and that He sent Him to
live among us briefly, and then to give His life as a ransom (a sacrifice) for
our sins.
We may now be
reconciled to God... to eternal life with Him, by accepting forgiveness of our
sins through Jesus. That which is
also necessary is that we repent (turn) from our sinning and live to please God.
All who refuse to accept God's love and forgiveness will receive terrible
judgment.
I urge you to
make your peace with God today. Then read the Bible that you may grow in your
new life. I suggest that you begin
reading in the book of Luke in the New Testament. God bless you!
"Man
shall not create a new world as he seeks. For there cannot be a lasting world
without His God. And I speak not of the false idols and gods that man creates in
his human nature! There is only one Creator....
"Little by little you go forward--I say, little by
little, but I should stress that many is running fast and faster to the edge of
the abyss. In his seeking for power and knowledge, man seeks to dethrone his God
and create his own god. But who shall set himself above his Creator, even
attempting to control birth and death? I say unto you, you shall never learn the
secrets, the sacred secrets of death and life, for these are controlled by the
Eternal Father." - Jesus, February 10, 1978
"A war far greater than any war fought in the history of creation shall come upon mankind soon. Flames shall engulf many nations, burning the skin from the bones, and the skin shall dry up and blow away as if it had never been! Eyes will see and still not believe that these are the fruits of their evil corruptive ways and loss of a belief in the Creator." - Our Lady of the Roses, May 28, 1978
Directives from Heaven
D56 - Science PDF
D161 - The Great Apostasy PDF
D164 - Heresy PDF
Articles
VIDEO:
Origin of Man - Dr. Duane Gish
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EnhKPocNb4
VIDEO:
Polystrate Trees: Upright Trees Are Evidence of Catastrophe (David Rives)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKo9UqsS73g
Evolution: The modern anti-science
http://www.nuestrasenoradelasrosas.org/news1/evolution-modern-antiscience.html
The
mathematical impossibility of evolution (Dr. Henry Morris)
https://www.icr.org/i/pdf/btg/btg-179.pdf
Should We Expect to Find Transitional Forms in the Fossil Record?
http://www.icr.org/article/should-we-expect-find-transitional-forms-fossil-re/
Darwinian evolution incompatible with Catholic Faith says Cardinal and author of
Catholic Catechism
http://www.tldm.org/News8/evolution.htm
Adam
and Eve: fact or fable?
http://www.tldm.org/News6/Adam&Eve.htm
Teilhard de Chardin is in hell
http://www.tldm.org/news6/teilhard.htm
"You shall be as
gods": secular humanism and the kingdom of man (Part 1)
http://www.tldm.org/News6/SecularHumanism.htm
"You shall be as
gods": Secular humanism and self-idolatry (Part 2)
http://www.tldm.org/news7/SelfIdolatry.htm
Revised:
August 07, 2022