2. abortion on demand: The first country to legalize the killing of innocent unborn babies was … Russia. "In 1920, under Bolshevik rule, Russia was the first country to legalize abortion up to birth without restrictions." (Read more) 

Abortion on demand breaks the 6th Commandment "Thou shalt not kill" and also facilitates fornication, which is the breaking of the 9th Commandment. 

3. “universal health care”:  Diana West wrote in her monumental book, American Betrayal: 

"Government control of private sector activity, as the American people well know, is aptly described as Bolshevik—or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, and, for that matter, fascist, too. Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917. (Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately.) Further, it is worth noting that one of the most prominent early champions of nationalized health insurance and socialized medicine in this country, Henry Sigerist, was a notorious apologist for Stalin, including his state-engineered famine in the Ukraine. According to historian John F. Hutchinson, Sigerist “shared with the architects of Soviet health policy under Stalin an outlook best described as medical totalitarianism. He really believed that humanity would be better off if every individual were under the medical supervision of the state from the cradle to the grave . . . Sigerist’s belief in the necessity for state control over all aspects of medicine ultimately made him an apologist for state control over most aspects of human life.”" (American Betrayal, pp. 32-33) 

The murder of baby Alfie Evans is a grim reminder of the totalitarian effects of state-run health care. Remember that baby Alfie's parents wanted to seek treatment elsewhere, when the U.K. hospital determined his case to be "hopeless." Government officials denied the parents' right to move their child, which was a death sentence for their baby. Daren Jonescu writes that Great Britain "has accepted, as a governing principle, the foundation of Marxist philosophy: the individual human being is the property of the state." 

I was told by a Polish family who escaped communist Poland that one of the first things the Russians did was to impose universal health care.  Imagine the coercive power the communist state has over you if they can deny you medical treatment because your religion or political views are opposed to the communist state.
 

4. radical feminism: Karl Marx hated marriage and followers of communism seek to destroy and invert the natural relationship between men and women (Read more). Communism seeks to pit natural complements against each other: poor against rich, race against race, workers against employers, citizen against state, women against men, children against parents. The result is the destruction of families and societies. Radical feminism seeks to replace the doctrine of original sin with their own version: "Feminist theory provides a doctrine of original sin: The world’s evil’s originate in male supremacy", i.e., the "patriarchy" (Read more). The lies of feminism are legion, but here are a few (Read more). 

Radical feminism has never been about equality, it is all about power. Former feminists have said so, such as Erin Pizzey, credited with opening the first women's shelter in London. Erin Pizzey states that the Marxists changed their tactics in the West and focused on "the patriarchy" as the enemy instead of capitalism, which was successful beyond their expectations. Feminist ideology is rooted in communism. 

Several outstanding rebuttals to feminism are available on Youtube. I highly recommend the videos by Lauren Southern and Lauren Chen. A marvelous expose of feminism has also been put together by Casey Jaye entitled "The Red Pill", which is available on Amazon, Youtube, and several other platforms. A sneak preview is available here. Respect to Casey Jaye for her work in exposing the lies of feminism, and her openness to the truth. By the end of making her documentary Casey Jaye stated, "I no longer consider myself a feminist." 

5. "redistribution of wealth": Numerous Popes have condemned this error. As Pope Leo XIII stated, communists/socialists "assail the right of property sanctioned by natural law; and by a scheme of horrible wickedness, while they seem desirous of caring for the needs and satisfying the desires of all men, they strive to seize and hold in common whatever has been acquired either by title of lawful inheritance, or by labor of brain and hands, or by thrift in one’s mode of life.” (Encyclical Quod Apostolici Muneris, December 28, 1878, n. 1) 

Basically, the communists' "redistribution of wealth" enshrines envy as a virtue. Winston Churchill described socialism as “the gospel of envy.” It is a denial of the 7th Commandment "thou shalt not steal." (Read more) 

6. media propaganda and "political correctness": Thought control is not something confined to communist dictatorships, but is employed by all dictatorships. It is necessary for the evil to retain power. As Stalin said, "Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns; why should we let them have ideas?" Political correctness uses ostracism/punishment to enforce adherence to the "party line." If you do not conform, you are punished. Too many citizens throughout the world have become cowards who won't stand up for their convictions if it means losing financial advantage, friends or social status. As the saying goes, "all it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing." 

The communists and statists seek to control your speech and thoughts. Political correctness is Marxism (Read more).  

7. "equality of outcomes": Communists and Statists do not promote equality of opportunity, but equality of outcomes. This is accomplished by restraint and servitude, imposed by coercive methods and unjust laws. Jordan Peterson has a great video on this topic (watch video). 

Mark Levin, in his book Liberty and Tyranny, has a useful definition of the Statist:  

"[T]he Statist is dissatisfied with the condition of his own existence. He condemns his fellow man, surroundings, and society itself for denying him the fulfillment, success, and adulation he believes he deserves. He is angry, resentful, petulant, and jealous. He is incapable of honest self-assessment and rejects the honest assessment by others of himself, thereby evading responsibility for his own miserable condition. The Statist searches for significance and even glory in a utopian fiction of his mind's making, the earthly attainment of which, he believes, is frustrated by those who do not share it. Therefore, he must destroy the civil society, piece by piece." (pp. 15-16) 

With Mark Levin's definition of the Statist, we can more easily see what "equality of outcomes" is really about. Let us read what economist Friedrich Hayek said about the differences between democracy and socialism: 

"Nobody saw more clearly than the great political thinker de Tocqueville that democracy stands in an irreconcilable conflict with socialism: 'Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom,' he said. 'Democracy attaches all possible value to each man,' he said in 1848, 'while socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.'" (quoted in Liberty and Tyranny, p. 91) 

Instead of promoting a hierarchy of competence in society (those who are the most talented, hardest working and most virtuous are rewarded and rise to the top), communists are all about power and promote envy against those who successfully achieve by their natural talents. You can see the pathological views of communists/socialists in their imposition of unjust, irrational laws upon society. 

It cannot be emphasized enough: communists promote the breaking of the Commandments. And regarding "equality of outcomes", envy and laziness (sloth) are promoted and enshrined. What we have as a result of these Leftist/liberal/progressive policies is a generation that is lazy, privileged and spoiled. In the words of Jordan Peterson, "You want to make cringing milksops who whine about being victims while they're going to ivy-league institutions; it's pathetic." 

Steven Crowder said it well: "Almost all of our problems, and those that stem from the Left--identity politics to tax policy, everything from race to gender to tax policy--they are trying to ensure equality of outcomes which, by its very definition precludes equality of opportunity." (watch video) 

The concept of "equality of outcomes" is a very potent weapon in the hands of the communists/socialists/Statists to destroy American society and reshape it into their Marxist dystopia. Remember, this is a battle of truth vs. lies, of reality vs. unreality, good vs. evil. 

Affirmative action:  

A major weapon in the equality of outcomes arsenal is affirmative action. Let's make a distinction right from the beginning: assistance to the poor, the vulnerable, the handicapped, the discriminated against, is praiseworthy. Christian churches and Christian families have a great responsibility to live the Gospel, and assist their neighbors who are in need. 

But it must be done in a way that encourages personal responsibility and the public good. To enable laziness, irresponsibility, or a sinful lifestyle is to hurt that person. There is the necessary role of tough love, and that is what many of these people truly need. 

What motivation is there to work harder, become more skilled, if all you have to do is say you are a victim and get preferential treatment, or check out of the work force and live on welfare? Is that honorable and responsible? Of course not. But that is what we have come to as a society. 

The welfare system is being massively abused. For this and many other reasons, Pope St. John Paul II condemned the welfare state, as have many other Popes. 

Furthermore, affirmative action is being used as a political weapon to buy votes; it is using ethnic groups as political pawns. A politician who is Santa Claus giving you free things will win the votes of the unscrupulous, lazy and immoral citizens. Many will become addicted to these favors and not want to give them up. There are many politicians who want to addict citizens to reckless welfare policies to ensure their own political power. 

Youtuber Lauren Chen ("Roaming Millennial") explains that “Trying to artificially prop up members of the minority group while pushing down members of the majority group goes completely against the concept of equality by not treating these groups equally.” She emphasizes that “Social justice is at its very core a Marxist ideology.” 

Candace Owens argues that the Democrat party has used the black community. She writes, "We need to stop calling them liberals and begin referring to them as exactly what they are: American communists, that wish to partake in the destruction of western civilization." She is a supporter of Blexit, or blacks exiting the Democrat party.

The Heritage Foundation has a great article entitled "Discriminating Toward Equality: Affirmative Action and the Diversity Charade" which is well worth reading. 

Katie Kieffer's article "Affirmative Action for Thugs" is another eye-opener. 

Steven Crowder's explanation of equal outcomes is also very informative.  

Propaganda against men in the workforce:  

The wage-gap myth is one of the most monotonously enduring lies in the feminists' talking points. Prager University and Jordan Peterson explode this myth quite well.  

Ben Shapiro has a humorous take on it: "If I could hire nobody but women at 77 cents on the dollar for the same work as men, and everybody was stupid enough not to hire any of the women, I'd be the richest man in America." 

UFC fighter Ronda Rousey shot down a feminist reporter and explained she is the highest paid UFC fighter because she makes more money for the UFC, exploding the myth that women are discriminated against in their pay. In sports, some female athletes make less than men, because fans are less willing to watch some women's sports and therefore bring in less money for their teams and networks. They earn less not because they are women, but because they bring in less money for their employers. This metric applies to men as well. The best men athletes make more money than their fellow players. Leo Messi, Kobe Bryant, LeBron James and Tom Brady bring in the crowds, so they are paid more.